Early Intervention - Family Involvement - Middle School
Scenario | Introduction | Strategies | Barriers | Resources | Comments | Key Words
Christy, a 7th grade student, had always struggled with math concepts ever since elementary school. Just before entering middle school, her family moved into a neighborhood of higher socioeconomic status. Changing schools presented some real challenges for Christy.
After attending her new school for only a few days, Christy began to notice that the other students were ahead of her academically in almost every class. Assignments were more difficult than at her former school and there was not much help for Christy at home. Both parents worked and two younger brothers consumed most of their attention. Christy hesitated to ask for help. Her struggles with homework and other school assignments continued week after week.
At the end of the first semester, when grades came out for the first time, Christy discovered that she had failed all subjects except P.E. and art. Her disappointment was compounded by her parent’s anger and threats to have her repeat 7th grade. Feelings of despair and hopelessness began to consume her thinking.
Eventually, Christy began looking elsewhere for success. After school, she “hung out” with older peers who had also experienced failure at school. Succeeding at school was not important anymore and thoughts of dropping out of school seemed to be the only way out.
Many children face similar circumstances that Christy is experiencing. Her academic challenges and lack of direction at home leave her frustrated and overwhelmed thus causing her to get attention any way she can. The problems she is facing have the potential to escalate the behavior issues; therefore, the eventual possibility of becoming a high school dropout increases.
How can what seems to be an unbridgeable gap between Christy’s home and school be effectively addressed? How has the gap been created? Is the parent unwilling to be involved with Christy’s education or is the school uninviting? It is essential that schools recognize these critical questions and begin to bridge the gap, reaching out so that all students like Christy and their families feel a part of the learning community.
Family involvement plays a crucial role in dropout prevention. It has been documented to increase student achievement, enhance positive attitude, decrease negative behavior, achieve higher graduation rates, higher grades, increased attendance, better homework completion, more enthusiastic teachers, and higher teacher expectations (Kentucky Department of Education).
Strong family involvement, good early childhood education (KDE, Early Childhood), and the development of solid reading and writing skills (See Reading and Writing) compose the fundamental components existing in a comprehensive effort to keep students in school. These common core strategies establish the framework for dropout prevention. Without these primary factors, other strategies and initiatives falter (Schargel & Smink, 2001).
Research has demonstrated the positive effects of parental involvement in schools. Parental involvement in the 8th grade had a strong positive effect on the grade point average of 10th graders (Keith, Keith, Quirt, Sperduto, Santillo, & Killings, 1998). In addition, when parents have a positive attitude regarding education and demonstrate trust that their children can do well, children do better in school (Ballen & Moles, 1994; Hurst, 2002). However, parental involvement tends to decrease as students become older.
Federally, schools have a responsibility to ensure that families are involved and informed of their children’s needs. The No Child Left Behind Act, 2001 (NCLB) requires that Title I funded schools develop a parental involvement policy that is agreeable with parents. In addition, the law requires that parent input has to be collected and an annual evaluation has to be conducted of the policy, specifically with regard to its impact on student achievement (How Can I Protect My Child, 2002).
Family involvement requires a partnership between the family and the school. Several federal programs have mandated family involvement in order for schools to participate in order to be eligible for specific funding (e.g. Head Start, Follow Through, Chapter One/Title One, and Special Education) (Schargel, and Smink, 2001). Still, some schools and families have struggled with establishing a school-family relationship and maintaining this relationship as the student gets older. Schools and communities do not always fully understand the struggles that families have when it comes to communicating about their child’s education (National Dropout Prevention Center).
When a student enters middle school, several changes take place that make family involvement crucial to support the student. Students begin to make personal and educational decisions that could ultimately have serious consequences. In addition, the way a middle school operates may be significantly different from the way an elementary school operates. Not only does the student have to adjust, but the families have to learn the new policies and procedures. Students are both expected and desire to function on a more autonomous level. This reduces their dependency on both their parents and teachers, creating an opportunity for a breakdown in home-school communication (Rutherford, and Billig, 1995).
Successful home-school partnerships view student achievement as a shared responsibility. All stakeholders including parents, administrators, teachers, and community leaders, play an important role in supporting children’s learning and keeping children engaged in the learning process.
Dr Joyce Epstein, Co-Director of the Center on Families, Communities, Schools and Children’s Learning, John Hopkins University, concludes, “...there are many reasons for developing school, family, and community partnerships. Successful partnerships can improve schools’ programs and school climate, provide family services and support, increase parents’ skills and leadership, connect families with others in the school and in the community, and help teachers, students, and others view one another as partners in education." However, the main reason to create such partnerships is so that all children succeed in school and in later life.
Several factors must be considered when building partnerships. Job and family demands leave parents with little free time. Single-parent families and those with two working parents have become the norm. Often the parents who stay away tend to be members of racial and ethnic minorities, have less income, and are less at ease with the English language. Schools bear the responsibility to reach out to all families but especially to those families that have children that are most at risk for academic failure.
Research findings indicate that the following actions must be taken at the school level in order to improve family-school connections and family involvement programs:
Step by step guidance can be found in the following resources; National Standards for Parent/family Involvement Programs (1998) and National Coalition for Parent Involvement in Education.
Family involvement in the schools is not a quick fix nor a luxury; it is a fundamental point of a healthy school system (Henderson, 1987). The array of services and programs schools are expected to provide to meet the needs of students within the classrooms require additional financial and human resources. Dr. Epstein has identified six types of parent involvement:
For the purpose of this resource guide we will address each of them.
Based on Epstein’s research and the Loucks & Loucks (1990), model selected strategies are provided for review that will promote family involvement and address each type of family involvement. A more comprehensive list of strategies that address each type of family involvement can be reviewed in the following two resources.: National Standards for Parent/Family Involvement Programs, National PTA, and Keys to Re-engaging Families in the Education of Young Adolescents by Loucks & Waggoner (1998).
Type I-Parenting
Parents and families are a child’s first teacher and a child’s life support system. Therefore the most vital support a child can receive comes from the home. The home learning environment has been cited as a point of importance when discussing dropout prevention. Overt modeling of the importance of education, provision of youth activities, appropriate household chores, and including children in family decision making promotes students motivation to learn. The major emphasis of home learning activities in grades four through eight include helping parents:
Sample Practices and Activities:
Type II-Family and School as Communicators
Communication is the foundation of developing a strong partnership. When parents and educators communicate effectively, positive relationships develop, problems are more easily addressed, and students make greater progress. Middle and high schools often vary in the forms, frequency, and content of communications they use with families. This can greatly affect how families receive information and whether the information sent home, can be understood by all families. Effective communication consists of strategies for encouraging clear two-way communication between the school and the home.
Sample Practices and Activities:
Type III-Families as Volunteers and Supporters
When parents volunteer, both families and schools reap benefits from their efforts. Studies have concluded that volunteers express greater confidence in the schools where they have opportunities to participate regularly. In addition, assisting in school programs or events and activities communicates to a child, "I care about what you do here.”
Sample Practices and Activities:
Type IV-Families as Learners
Parents are their child’s first and best teacher. Schools can assist parents and family members in developing new skills in areas requested by parents. Families from all socioeconomic and educational backgrounds can benefit from opportunities to improve their skills. The school should ensure that parents understand the skills needed for their child to pass each course and what the parent can do to support their child. It must be clear that the school does not expect families to “teach” the course but to encourage, listen, react, praise, guide, monitor, and discuss the work the student brings home.
Sample Practices and Activities:
Type V-Family as Decision Maker and Advocate
Studies have shown that schools where parents are involved in decision-making and advocacy have higher levels of student achievement. Schools and programs that actively enlist parent /family participation and input, communicate that parents/families are valued as full partners in the educating of their children. For a school to be most effective it is critical to have a collaborative decision-making process on issues from curriculum and course selection, to discipline policies and over –all school reform measures. The Kentucky Education Reform Act (1990) (Internet Resources of Information on the Kentucky Education Reform Act) supported this concept by establishing through statute, parent participation on the School Based Decision Making Councils and on Family Resource Youth Services Center Advisory councils.
Sample Practices and Activities:
Type VI-Collaborating with Community
When schools and communities work together, both are strengthened in synergistic ways and make gains that outpace what either entity could accomplish on it own:
Sample Practices/Activities:
Additional Strategies:
Home Visits
One of the most effective strategies for schools to consider and implement has been home visits, mentioned briefly as a Sample Practice. It is a strategy that can have a major impact and warrants further discussion. Home visits can bridge the gap between home and school and help facilitate parent and teacher relationships. These visits can provide the teacher with much needed insight to enhance the child’s in-school education. Kyle, & McIntyre (2000) have created excellent guidelines for home visits.
Other challenges to be considered and addressed as they relate to family engagement are:
Administrative Leadership
The principal or program director plays a major role in making family involvement a reality. The climate in a school is created by the tone of the office staff and administrators. If the principal or program director collaborates with parents, educators or others, the staff will more likely do the same. Without administrative leadership, long-term progress in family-school partnerships are difficult to achieve. However, when family involvement becomes a mutual program goal, and families, educators, and administrator’s work together as a team to develop an effective family involvement plan, significant progress is noted.
Affirming Diversity and the Changing of Family Structures
Programs serving families must be aware and sensitive to the changes in our society. The values, attitudes, manners, and views of all populations represented in the school community should be respected and honored. (Golan & Peterson, 2002). In addition, not only is there a need to serve culturally diverse populations, but there is a need to be sensitive and supportive to the continually changing family structure. Single-parent families are on the rise as well as a number of grandparents who serve as primary caregivers to their grand children. Both of these family structures have very different issues that will need to be considered.
Systemic Support
Systemic support is a must if family involvement traditions and habits are to be transformed. Adequate support from the education authorities outside of the school is critical to ensure positive changes. Proactive family involvement policies and practices at the district, state, and national levels are prerequisite. Principals and educators need to know their leaders are willing to support and encourage them as they seek to implement change. For further discussion review: Golan & Peterson's (2002), An Action Guide for Community and Parent Leaders.
Teacher Preparation
Finally, the last challenge to consider is that few teachers receive adequate preparation in how to partner with parents. Teachers receive very little instruction during their education related to parent involvement. No state requires a separate course in parent involvement for teacher licensure. Therefore, it is important to provide teachers in-service related to family involvement and other professional development opportunities.
According to Loucks & Waggoner (1998) three groups of families are considered “hard-to-reach.” They are families who:
Hard-to-reach families are those who:
Engaging families in effective ways requires confronting the barriers that have previously prevented positive interaction, and the building of a partnership between home and school. A few of the barriers identified in Loucks and Waggoner (1998) are discussed and strategies to address barriers are noted:
Family Involvement Barriers
Parents...
Keys to Overcome the Barriers
Schools...
Kentucky Resources
Division of Student Family, Community Support Services
Kentucky Department for Education
Contact person: Dr Angela Wilkins, Division Director
502-564-3678
awilkins@kde.state.ky.us
Kentucky Coalition of School Volunteer Organizations
Lilly Sullivan
10112 Leitchfield Road
Cecilia, KY 42724
270-862-2014
Lillsull5@aol.com
Kentucky Community Education Association
Patty Crittenden
700 Leslie Avenue
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-875-1481
pcritten@franklin.k12.ky.us
Kentucky Family Resource Youth Services Centers (FRYSC)
Promotes, identifies and coordinates resources for children and their families.
Contact person: Dr. Sandy Goodlett, Executive Director
Cabinet for Families and Children
Linda Robinson, KDE Liaison
(502)-564-3678
Currently there are 774 centers in the state of Kentucky. schools. The FRYSC Regional Program Managers are divided in ten regions and are a valuable resource that can be contacted for model sites in their region as it relates to Family/Community involvement. To review the Region Program Managers information go to http://www.kde.state.ky.us/osle/frysc/default.asp.
Kentucky Kin-Care Program
Bill Montgomery, coordinator
Office of Aging Services
275 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502-564-6930
E-mail: bill.Montgomery@mail.state.ky.us
This projects mission is to provide leadership in responding to issues that relate to over 62,000 grandparents who are raising grandchildren: to develop support groups to enable persons facing similar problems to cope through the sharing of experiences and to assist in identifying needed resources.
Kentucky PTA
P.O. Box 654
Frankfort, Ky. 40602
502-564-4378
Sharon Barker, President
Parent Leadership Associates
Kentucky Prichard Committee/KSA-Plus Communications collaboration
Bev Raimondo Director Parent Leadership Associates
859-233-9849
raimondo@prichardcommittee.org
Adan Kerman-Schloss
President KSA-Plus Communications
adam@ksaplus.com
703-528-7100
http://www.plassociates.org/
Parent Leadership Associates offers a wide range of customized consulting and training services, plus easy to understand materials that help parents better understand how to improve schools.
Parent Resources Centers
Jan Richards, consultant
Division of Exceptional Children
KY Department of Education
502-564-4970
Jrichards@kde.state.ky.us
General Resources
All Parents are Teachers: Review Research (n.d.). Retrieved on October 28 from http://www.parenting.umn.edu/apat/RR/Other/rr01-c05.html
Building Successful Partnerships: A Guide for Developing Parent and Family Involvement Programs. Bloomington, IN: National PTA National Educational Services.
This practical focuses on ways to implement the six National Standards for Parent/Family Involvement Programs.
Decker, L. E., Gregg, G.A., & Decker V. A. (n.d.). Teachers Manual for Parent and Community Involvement. Fairfax, VA: National Community Education Association.
Phone: 703-359-8973
This resource provides teachers with information on the important role that the classroom teacher plays in parent and community involvement efforts within the education setting.
Denn, R. (2002, March 15). Black parent’s fragile link to schools
[Electronic version]. Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Retrieved on October 28 from http://www.seattlepi.com/
Druin, G., & Butler, J.A. (n.d.). Effective schooling practices and at-risk youth. What research shows, topical synthesis #1. School Improvement Research Series. Retrieved on August 28, 2002, from Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory Web site:
http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/1/topsyn1.html
Epstein, J.L. (1988). How Do We Improve programs for parent involvement? Educational Horizons, 66, 58-59.
Epstein, J. L. (1987). Toward a theory of family-School connections: teacher practices and parent involvement across the school years. Berlin, NY: Aldine DeGruyter.
Epstein, J.L., & Connors, L.J. (1995). School and Family Partnerships in the
Middle Grades. In Rutherford, B. (Ed.). Creating Family/School Partnerships (pp. 137-167). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
Epstein, & Salinas (1990). ERIC Clearing House on Urban Education. Retrieved on December 14, 2002, from http://eric-web.tc.columbia.edu/families/strong/references.html
Funkhouser, J. E. and Gonzales M.R. (n.d.). Family involvement in Children’s
Education: Successful Local Approaches: An Idea Book [Electronic version].
Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Education, Office of Education Research and Improvement. Retrieved October 29 from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/FamInvolve/
Golan, S. & Peterson, D. (2002). An action guide for community and parent leaders. Washington, DC: Public Education Network Retrieved from http://www.PublicEducation.org
Phone: 202-628-7460
This resource provides a comprehensive reference guide that will assist every community and parent leader in using No Child Left Behind to create strong partnerships with schools.
Henderson, A.T., & Berla, N.(1995). A new generation of evidence: The family is critical to student achievement. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Education.
How can I help my child? (2002, October). Retrieved December 14, 2002, from
American Federation of Teachers Web Site: http://www.aft.org/erd/corner.htm
Kyle, D., & McIntyre, E. (2000, October). Family visits benefit teachers and families-and students most of all (Practitioner Brief #1). Retrieved on October 28, 2002, from Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence Web site: http://crede.ucsc.edu/products/print/pract_briefs/pb1.shtml
Loucks, H. E., & Waggoner, J. E. (1998). Keys to reengaging families in the education of young adolescents. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
This publication focuses on strategies for engaging families in the education. Adolescents but are valuable for all grade levels. Information provided in this resource is easily accessible and practical for teachers, parent coordinators, and individual serving in related roles.
The National Coalition for Parent Involvement in Education (NCPIE)
Washington, DC 20036
202-822-8405
http://www.ncpie.org
This organizations provides many resources that addresse a wide variety of
Issues related to parent /family involvement based on years of research. A
resource guide can be reviewed at http://www.ncpie.org/Resources/parents.html
National Dropout Prevention Center
Clemson University, 209 Martin St.
Clemson, SC 29631-1555
864-656-0136
E-mail: ndpc@clemson.edu
http://www.dropoutprevention.org/
National standards for parent/family involvement programs, (1998). Chicago, IL: National PTA. Retrieved from National PTA Web site: http://www.pta.org/parentinvolvement/standards/natstand_jan01.asp.
E-mail: info@pta.org
This resource was developed by the National PTA in cooperation with education and parent involvement professionals through the National Coalition for Parent Involvement In Education. Building upon the six types of involvement identified by Joyce L. Epstein, PhD of the Center on School Family and Community Partnerships at John Hopkins University, National PTA created program standards for excellence. It offers many strategies to address each type of parent involvement.
The Partnership for Family Involvement in Education
U.S. Department of Education
Washington, DC 20202-8173
800-872-5327
http://www.ed.gov/offices/OIIA/pfie/
Promoting involvement of recent immigrant families in thei children's education (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.gse.harvard.edu/~hfrp/projects/fine/resources/research/golan.html
Rich, D. (2002). Parent power. Retrieved on December 14, 2002, from the National Education Association Web Site: http://www.nea.org/parents/ppower.html
This is a booklet of home learning recipes that are designed to boost learning in reading, writing, math, and science and also foster the broader skills, including responsibility, perseverance, teamwork and problem solving.
Schargel, F.P. & Smink, J. (2001). Strategies to help solve our school dropout problem. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
Phone: 914-633-0551
http://www.eyeoneducation.com
This book examines the 15 research-based strategies that address the dropout issues identified by the National Dropout Center at Clemson University. Chapter 4 specifically discusses Family involvement.
Why parent involvement is important (n.d.). Retrieved on December 14, 2002, from Kentucky Department of Education Web Site: http://www.kde.state.ky.us/comm/pubinfo/parents/docs/important.asp
Copyright © 2003 Commonwealth of Kentucky.
All rights reserved.
Contact the Webmaster: ihdi-www@lsv.uky.edu